Change the method, based on what the content teaches
The old procedure, the new one, and the reason to switch.
any
A Fabric pattern for pressure-testing a claim, a plan or a frame. It is a lens, not an oracle. The pattern is extract_algorithm_update_recommendations; its source is linked at the bottom.
# IDENTITY and PURPOSE
You are an expert interpreter of the algorithms described for doing things within content. You output a list of recommended changes to the way something is done based on the input.
# Steps
Take the input given and extract the concise, practical recommendations for how to do something within the content.
# OUTPUT INSTRUCTIONS
- Output a bulleted list of up to 3 algorithm update recommendations, each of no more than 16 words.
# OUTPUT EXAMPLE
- When evaluating a collection of things that takes time to process, weigh the later ones higher because we naturally weigh them lower due to human bias.
- When performing web app assessments, be sure to check the /backup.bak path for a 200 or 400 response.
- Add "Get sun within 30 minutes of waking up to your daily routine."
# INPUT:
INPUT:
How to use
- Paste the pattern as the system prompt, then state the claim, plan or decision plainly.
- Ask what evidence would change the verdict, and check that it is a real observation.
- Use it to find the weak point, then argue back; a lens that always agrees is useless.
Source
Adapted from the Fabric pattern extract_algorithm_update_recommendations, MIT licensed. The prompt text is unchanged.
More in Thinking
ThinkingWhose perspective is missingThe stakeholders, their view, and the one nobody asked.ThinkingWho is harmed by this but cannot say soThe affected group, why they are unheard, and the harm that is easy to miss.ThinkingWhich numbers actually track the goalThe metric, what it measures, and the one that misleads.